Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Lord's Days 43

Link to catechism questions

Lord's Day Questions with proof texts

Link to audio recording of LD 4

LD 43 NotebookLM generated discussion 

Summary (NotebookLM)  

This section of Ursinus' commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism presents a detailed examination of the Ninth Commandment, focusing on the establishment and preservation of truth among people. It forbids various forms of falsehood, including bearing false witness, slandering, and all types of lying, classifying them as works of the devil. The text then outlines several virtues associated with upholding truth, such as veracity, candor, simplicity, constancy, and docility, explaining their importance and defining their opposing vices like calumny, obstinacy, and fickleness. Furthermore, it discusses virtues necessary for truth to be profitable, including taciturnity, affability, and urbanity, each with their respective extremes such as gossiping, moroseness, and scurrility, ultimately providing a comprehensive framework for ethical communication and conduct.

Chapter Contents:

The overarching theme of the Ninth Commandment, as discusses in this chapter, is the "establishment and preservation of truth amongst men," emphasizing the moral imperative to embrace honesty in all aspects of life and to actively defend a neighbor's good name. The text delves into various facets of truth, its practical applications, and the destructive nature of falsehood.

II. The Ninth Commandment: Core Requirements

The Ninth Commandment, as interpreted in the text, requires the following:

  • Avoidance of False Witness: "That I bear false witness against no one." This is the foundational prohibition.

  • Rejection of Distortion: "twist no one’s words." This extends beyond direct lies to misrepresentation.

  • No Backbiting or Slander: "be no backbiter or slanderer." This addresses speaking ill of others behind their back or spreading damaging rumors.

  • Fair Judgment: "join in condemning no one unheard or rashly." Due process and careful consideration are mandated.

  • Abstinence from Lying and Deceit: "avoid all lying and deceit as the very works of the devil." Lying is presented as fundamentally evil and associated with malevolent forces.

  • Affirmative Duty to Truth: "love, speak honestly, and confess the truth" in all affairs, particularly "in matters of judgment and justice."

  • Defense of Neighbor's Reputation: "insofar as I can, defend and promote my neighbor’s good name." This is an active and protective responsibility.

The text states that the "design or end of this ninth commandment is the establishment and preservation of truth amongst men." It views "lying" as the "genus" of all forbidden actions, contrasting it with "truth" or "veracity" as the "head, the fountain and genus" of enjoined virtues. Truth is defined as "the agreement or correspondence which our knowledge or words have with the thing of which we affirm something."

III. The Virtues of the Ninth Commandment

The text meticulously enumerates and defines eight virtues, all stemming from or supporting truth:

1. Truth (Veracity)

  • Definition: "a firm purpose or choice in the will, by which we constantly embrace true thoughts and opinions, and profess and defend the same according to a sense of duty... keep contracts and promises, and avoid, both in our speech and deportment all deceitful dissemblings, for the glory of God and the safety of our neighbor."

  • Key Idea: Truth is not merely speaking facts, but an active, habitual commitment to honesty driven by a desire for God's glory and the well-being of others. The devil, though he may speak truth, "cannot be true" because he lacks this inherent love for truth.

  • Relation to other Commandments: Confession of truth is also in the third commandment (as worship of God), but here it's focused on "unwillingness to deceive our neighbor, but desire that his character and safety be preserved."

  • Opposing Vices:Falsehood/Lying: "comprehends all the various kinds of fraud, deceit, dissembling, lies of courtesy, slanders, backbitings and evil speaking." This includes "negligence as does not seek to obtain a true knowledge of things, together with willful ignorance."

  • Lies of Courtesy: Explicitly condemned: "nor are those lies which are uttered for politeness sake, excused, because we may not do evil, that good may come." "Lactantius very correctly says, We should never lie, because a lie always injures or deceives some one.”

  • Vanity/Levity: "a readiness for lying," characterized by lying "much, often, and readily, and that without any shame."

  • Untimely Profession of Truth: "to cast pearls before swine," sharing truth when it is inappropriate or unhelpful, causing injury rather than good.

  • Curiosity: "to inquire into what is not necessary, or impossible."

2. Candor

  • Definition: "a virtue which understands, in a proper light, things correctly and honestly spoken or done, and puts the most favorable construction upon such things as are doubtful... and does not readily entertain suspicions, or indulge in them... but yet thinking, concerning things changeable, that the minds of men may be changed, and that a man may err respecting another’s intention."

  • Key Idea: Candor involves charitable interpretation of others' words and actions, resisting unfounded suspicion and ill-will. It recognizes human fallibility and the hidden nature of intentions.

  • Opposing Vices:Calumny and Suspiciousness (Want): Calumny is "to criminate and find fault with the innocent" or "put the very worst construction upon things spoken indifferently." Suspiciousness is to "understand things... in the worst light," indulging in suspicions without "just cause" or to "too great an extent."

  • Foolish Credulity and Flattery (Excess): Credulity is "to interpret anything rashly or hastily" or believe things without "just and probable reasons." Flattery is "praising and admiring things which should not be praised, for the purpose of obtaining the fortune or favor of some one."

  • Nuance on Suspicion: While generally discouraged, "It is lawful for us, at times, to have suspicions, unless we wish to be the dupes and fools of others." Good suspicion is based on "just and sufficient grounds" and does not lead to immediate judgment or malice.

3. Simplicity

  • Definition: "truth in its nakedness, without any shiftings, prevarication, or quibbles; or, it is a virtue which honestly and openly speaks and does what is true, right, and understood in arts and common life."

  • Key Idea: Simplicity is direct, unadorned honesty, free from evasiveness or manipulation.

4. Constancy

  • Definition: "a virtue which does not depart from the truth in as far as it is known, and which does not change its purpose and design without a necessary and sufficient reason; but constantly says and does what is true, just and necessary."

  • Key Idea: Steadfastness in truth once discovered and approved, involving a consistent profession and defense of it.

  • Opposing Vices:Inconstancy (Want): Changing one's mind "without any sufficient reason."

  • Obstinacy/Stoical Rigor (Excess): "clings to false opinions, and persists in doing what is unjust and unprofitable, although convinced to the contrary." This often stems from pride.

5. Docility

  • Definition: "a virtue which investigates the reasons of those opinions which are true; readily yields and assents to those who teach or show things which are better, and that for reasons sound and convincing; and at the same time disposes the will to fall in with and assent to those reasons which are true and satisfactory, and to abandon what was before received and entertained."

  • Key Idea: An open-minded willingness to learn, investigate, and accept truth, even if it means abandoning prior beliefs.

  • Relationship to Constancy: "Constancy, without docility, would degenerate into obstinacy; and docility, without constancy, would degenerate into fickleness and inconstancy."

6. Taciturnity (Discreet Observance of Silence)

  • Definition: "a virtue which keeps to itself things not known and not necessary to be told, where, when, and in as far as it is proper to do so, and at the same time avoids an immoderate use of the tongue, in uttering such things as prudence would require not to be told."

  • Key Idea: Wise and prudent silence, knowing when not to speak, especially regarding secrets or things that would cause harm.

  • Opposing Vices:Gossiping/Prattling, Foolish Talking, Treachery (Want): Inability to keep secrets, speaking unseasonably or foolishly, or betraying confidences/plans.

  • Moroseness, Undue Reservedness (Excess): Being silent or holding back truth "when it ought to be declared," or dissembling truth when "the glory of God and the salvation of our fellow-men require a profession of it."

7. Affability (Readiness of Speaking)

  • Definition: "a virtue which hears, answers, and speaks willingly, and with evidence of good will, where it is proper by reason of some necessary or probable cause."

  • Key Idea: Openness, good-will, and ease in conversation, ensuring others feel comfortable in interaction.

  • Relationship to Taciturnity: "Taciturnity, without affability, becomes moroseness or peevishness; while affability, without taciturnity, degenerates into gossiping, prattling, and foolish talking."

8. Urbanity

  • Definition: "that which seasons and recommends truth and speech under every form... a facility and power of speaking the truth with a certain degree of grace, so as to teach, comfort, cheer, excite and move others without being accompanied with any unpleasantness or bitterness."

  • Key Idea: Speaking truth with grace, wit, and pleasantness, making it appealing and effective for teaching, comforting, or motivating others.

  • Opposing Vices:Scurrility, Raillery, Backbiting (Want): Obscene or low jesting, bitter jesting/scoffing (especially towards the pitiable), or spreading false reports with a desire for revenge and injury.

  • Foolishness, Want of Taste (Excess): Inappropriate affectation or silly imitation of urbanity.

IV. Conclusion

The Ninth Commandment is presented as a comprehensive directive for establishing and preserving truth in human society. It extends beyond simply avoiding lies to cultivating a deep-seated love for veracity, accompanied by a host of interconnected virtues. These virtues guide individuals not only in speaking honestly but also in interpreting others charitably, remaining steadfast in conviction, being open to new understanding, and communicating truth with both wisdom and grace. The text consistently condemns all forms of falsehood and deceit, linking them to "the very works of the devil," while emphasizing the pursuit of truth for "the glory of God and the safety of our neighbor."


What does the ninth commandment require?

The ninth commandment requires several specific actions and prohibitions, primarily centered around truth and the good name of one's neighbor.

Specifically, the ninth commandment requires that an individual:

  • Bear false witness against no one.

  • Twist no one's words.

  • Be no backbiter or slanderer.

  • Join in condemning no one unheard or rashly.

  • Avoid all lying and deceit as the "very works of the devil," on pain of God’s heavy wrath.

  • Love, speak honestly, and confess the truth in matters of judgment and justice, and in all other affairs.

  • Defend and promote a neighbor’s good name, insofar as one is able.

The underlying principle behind these requirements is the establishment and preservation of truth amongst men. The negative precept, "You shall not bear false witness of, or against your neighbor," implicitly includes an affirmative one: "You shall bear true witness of, or for your neighbor" and "love to learn and speak the truth". Truth, or veracity, is considered "the head, the fountain and genus" of the virtues enjoined by this commandment.


What overarching principle governs the virtues and vices detailed in this religious text?

The overarching principle that governs the virtues and vices detailed in this religious text is truth, or veracity.

The sources explicitly state that "The design or end of this ninth commandment is the establishment and preservation of truth amongst men". Truth is identified as "the head, the fountain and genus, as it were, of the virtues which are here enjoined". Conversely, falsehood is described as "the fountain, the genus of all the vices which are here condemned".

Truth or veracity is defined as "a firm purpose or choice in the will, by which we constantly embrace true thoughts and opinions, and profess and defend the same". All other virtues commended under this commandment "wait upon truth, or contribute to it, and are, as it were, certain appendages of it". For example, virtues such as candor, simplicity, constancy, and docility are presented as necessary for truth to be tempered, perceived, acknowledged, and preserved. Similarly, taciturnity, affability, and urbanity are presented as necessary for truth to be profitable in the world.


How many virtues are listed?

There are eight principal virtues explicitly listed and discussed in this religious text under the ninth commandment.

These virtues are:

  1. Truth or veracity

  2. Candor

  3. Simplicity

  4. Constancy

  5. Docility

  6. Taciturnity, or a discreet observance of silence

  7. Affability, or readiness of speaking

  8. Urbanity

The text also mentions "liberty of speech or boldness" as a virtue that Truth comprehends. All these virtues "wait upon truth, or contribute to it, and are, as it were, certain appendages of it".


What is the genus of vices?

In this religious text, the genus of all the vices that are condemned is falsehood.

Just as truth (or veracity) is identified as the "head, the fountain and genus" of the virtues enjoined by the ninth commandment, falsehood is presented as its direct counterpart, serving as the originating principle for all the condemned vices.


How is truth defined?

In this religious text, truth, or veracity, is defined in several ways:

  • It is understood as the agreement or correspondence which our knowledge or words have with the thing of which we affirm something. In simpler terms, a speech or declaration is considered true if it "harmonizes and agrees with the thing itself".

  • More broadly, TRUTH or veracity is described as "a firm purpose or choice in the will, by which we constantly embrace true thoughts and opinions, and profess and defend the same according to a sense of duty and the circumstances in which we are placed". This also involves keeping contracts and promises, and avoiding all deceitful dissemblings in both speech and deportment, for the glory of God and the safety of one's neighbor.

  • The text emphasizes that "he alone is true who speaks and loves the truth, and has a desire to promote it for the glory of God and the safety of his fellow-men". This implies that truth is not just about factual accuracy, but also about the intention and love for promoting it.

  • Truth is also depicted as "the head, the fountain and genus" of the virtues enjoined under the ninth commandment.

In essence, truth encompasses both accurate correspondence with reality in words and knowledge, and a moral commitment in the will to embrace, profess, defend, and live by what is true, for the well-being of others and the glory of God.


What is the purpose of truth?

The purpose of truth, or veracity, as detailed in this religious text, is multifaceted and central to the ninth commandment.

The primary purpose of truth is "the establishment and preservation of truth amongst men". This overarching goal forms the design and end of the ninth commandment.

More specifically, truth serves to:

  • Glorify God. Professing and defending truth, and avoiding deceit, is done "for the glory of God". The glory of God is a key reason for requiring the profession of truth.

  • Ensure the safety and well-being of one's neighbor. Truth is to be embraced, professed, and defended "for the safety of our neighbor". The desire that a neighbor's "character and safety be preserved" is a reason for requiring the confession of truth. Similarly, the "salvation of our fellow-men" necessitates the profession of truth.

  • Maintain integrity in thoughts, words, judgments, contracts, and doctrine. Truth involves a firm purpose to constantly embrace true thoughts and opinions, profess and defend them, and keep contracts and promises. It is defined as the agreement between knowledge or words and the thing being affirmed.

  • Avoid deceiving one's neighbor. The confession of truth is required because individuals should be "unwilling to deceive our neighbor".

In essence, truth aims to foster an environment of honesty and reliability for the benefit of both divine honor and human welfare.


How is candor defined?

Candor is defined as a virtue that is closely related to truth and is essential for properly understanding and interpreting the words and actions of others.

Specifically, candor involves:

  • Understanding things correctly and honestly spoken or done in a proper light.

  • Putting the most favorable construction upon doubtful matters, provided there are just reasons to do so.

  • Not readily entertaining or indulging in suspicions, even when there might be cause, and not basing actions or resolutions on these suspicions.

  • Sanctioning other conclusions when there are probable reasons for them.

  • Not indulging in any ill-will.

  • Interpreting doubtful things in the most probable light and hoping for the good.

  • Acknowledging the changeable nature of human minds and the possibility of erring about another's intention, as the "inmost recesses of the human heart are never brought fully to light".

The sources also emphasize that candor is an assistant, or species of truth, and is enjoined and commended in connection with truth. It plays a role in tempering and regulating truth and is necessary for the preservation of truth.


What does candor oppose?

Candor opposes several vices, which are identified as its lack or its extreme excess.

Specifically, candor is opposed by:

  • Falsehood or lying, and various forms of lying such as fraud, deceit, dissembling, lies of courtesy, slanders, backbitings, and evil speaking.

  • Calumny, which involves criminating and finding fault with the innocent without reason, putting the worst construction on indifferently spoken things, or propagating and coining falsehoods.

  • Suspiciousness, which means understanding correctly or ambiguously spoken things in the worst light, suspecting evil from good things, entertaining suspicions without just cause, or indulging in suspicions to an excessive degree even when there are proper reasons.

  • Foolish credulity, defined as rashly or hastily interpreting and assenting to something without just and probable reasons, or believing something despite evident and sufficient reasons to the contrary.

  • Flattery, which consists of praising and admiring things that should not be praised, for the purpose of obtaining someone's fortune or favor.

These oppositions highlight candor's role in promoting fair and charitable interpretation of others' words and actions, in contrast to deceit, unfounded accusations, and excessive skepticism or blind acceptance.


What is the opposite of urbanity?

The opposite of urbanity, as described by its "extremes" in the religious text, includes several vices.

Specifically, urbanity is opposed by:

  • Scurrility: This consists of obscene and low jesting, especially in holy things. The term "scurra" (from which scurrility derives) means a person who jests in this manner, speaking what is "obscene and filthy".

  • Raillery: This vice involves bitter jesting or scoffing, and in deriding and vexing others, particularly those who ought to be pitied.

  • Backbiting: This involves putting false reports into circulation regarding others, and putting the worst construction upon what is spoken doubtfully, driven by a desire for revenge, injuring, and exciting prejudice and opposition against someone.

  • Foolishness: This is described as an affectation of urbanity that is altogether inappropriate and out of place.

  • A want of taste: This shows itself in a silly imitation of urbanity.


How does docility relate to constancy?

Docility and constancy are presented as two virtues that are closely related and mutually dependent in this religious text. They are both necessary for properly embracing and maintaining truth.

Here's how they relate:

  • Docility is necessary for constancy: The text explicitly states that "Docility is also necessary to constancy; for constancy, without docility, would degenerate into obstinacy". This means that for a person to remain constant in truth, they must first be docile – willing to investigate, learn, and assent to what is better and true based on sound reasons. Without this openness to learning and changing one's mind when presented with better reasons, constancy would become a stubborn adherence to potentially false opinions, which is defined as obstinacy.

  • Constancy is necessary for docility: Conversely, "docility, without constancy, would degenerate into fickleness and inconstancy". Docility involves abandoning previously held beliefs when confronted with new, convincing truths. However, if this openness to change is not balanced by constancy – a virtue that holds fast to discovered and approved truth and does not change purpose without sufficient reason – it could lead to constantly shifting beliefs and an inability to maintain any firm position.

  • Shared Extremes: The text notes that "The extremes of this virtue [docility] are the same as those of constancy". The extremes of constancy are inconstancy (a lack of sticking to truth) and obstinacy (an excessive, unyielding adherence, even to false opinions). This further highlights their interconnectedness, as an imbalance in one can manifest as a vice associated with the other.

  • Perception and Preservation of Truth: Docility plays a role in how truth is "perceived and acknowledged", while constancy is necessary for the "preservation of truth".

In summary, docility and constancy act as a checks and balances system for each other, ensuring that one is neither stubbornly rigid in error nor excessively changeable without good reason, both in the pursuit and maintenance of truth.



Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Lord's Days 42

Link to catechism questions

Lord's Day Questions with proof texts

Link to audio recording of LD 42 

LD 42 NotebookLM generated discussion 

Summary (NotebookLM) 

This commentary on the eighth commandment explores the prohibitions against theft and fraud, broadly defined to include unjust practices, covetousness, and waste. It emphasizes the requirement to promote one's neighbor's good, practice the golden rule, and labor diligently to aid the poor. The text outlines seven virtues related to property and possessions, including commutative justice, contentment, fidelity, liberality, hospitality, parsimony, and frugality, explaining their nature and extremes. Finally, it addresses potential objections to the concept of private property, using examples from Scripture to defend the idea of distinct possessions.


Chapter Contents:

In discussion of the 42nd Lord's Day Ursinus provides interpretation and application of the Eighth Commandment ("You shall not steal"), providing a comprehensive understanding of the biblical prohibition against theft, its scope, and the corresponding positive duties required by God.

Key Themes:

  • Broad Definition of Theft: The commandment extends far beyond simple robbery or state-punished theft to encompass a wide range of deceptive and unfair practices aimed at acquiring a neighbor's goods.

  • Sanctioning of Private Property: The commandment implicitly validates and preserves the concept of private property or possessions, which God has given to individuals for the support of life.

  • Positive Duties: Beyond forbidding theft, the commandment requires active engagement in promoting a neighbor's well-being, dealing justly with others, and laboring diligently to be able to assist the poor.

  • Commutative Justice: A central virtue required by the commandment, focusing on fairness and equality in exchanges and contracts among individuals.

  • Economic Virtues: The commentary highlights several virtues related to the proper acquisition, management, and disposition of goods, including contentment, fidelity, liberality, hospitality, parsimony, and frugality.

  • Rejection of Communalism: The text directly addresses and refutes arguments for a mandatory community of goods, citing the voluntary, temporary, and particular nature of the early church's practice.

Most Important Ideas and Facts:

  • Scope of Forbidden Actions: God forbids "not only such theft and robbery as are punished by the government, but God views as theft also all wicked tricks and devices, whereby we seek to get our neighbor’s goods, whether by force or by deceit". This includes unjust weights, measures, goods, coins, usury (with certain exceptions), covetousness, and the misuse and waste of God's gifts.

  • Required Actions (Positive Duties): The commandment requires individuals to "further my neighbor’s good where I can and may; deal with him as I would have others deal with me; and labor faithfully, so that I may be able to help the poor in their need."

  • The Purpose of the Commandment: The "end or design of this commandment is, the preservation of the property or possessions which God has given to every one for the support of life".

  • Commutative Justice Defined: This virtue is described as "a virtue in the acquisition of goods, which does not desire the possessions of another, and contributes to an arithmetical equality in contracts and in the ordinary traffic amongst men in the purchase and exchange of goods according to just laws." It emphasizes preserving "an equality between merit and reward, wages and labor".

  • Examples of Commutative Justice in Contracts: The commentary provides a detailed list of ten classes of contracts that fall under commutative justice, including buying and selling, borrowing, lending, donation, exchange, leasing, pledging, committing in trust, partnership, and land cultivation agreements.

  • Vices Opposed to Commutative Justice: These include all unjust and unlawful transfers of property, whether by violence (robbery) or fraud and deceit (theft). Specific examples of theft mentioned are embezzling, sacrilege, merchandising deceptions, and usury (though just contracts are exempted).

  • Contentment: Defined as being "satisfied and contented with our present possessions, which we have honestly acquired, and by which we quietly endure poverty and other inconveniences, not desiring what does not belong to us, nor what is unnecessary". The extremes are avarice/theft and feigned refusal/inhumanity.

  • Fidelity: In this context, fidelity involves having "a concern and anxiety in regard to the losses and privations of another, and endeavors to avert them". It also includes "willingly and diligently performing all the different duties which are devolving upon us in our appropriate callings in order that we may have what is necessary to sustain us and ours, and that we may also have that with which we may supply the wants of others". Extremes are unfaithfulness and negligence/slothfulness.

  • Liberality: Described as contributing "of its substance to those who are in want, from right considerations and motives". It involves communicating possessions to others "with a liberal heart, according to their ability and the necessity of others, knowing where, to whom, when, and how much they are able to give". Extremes are penuriousness/covetousness and prodigality.

  • Hospitality: Defined as a "species of liberality" by which "we entertain strangers and travelers, and especially those who have been banished on account of the profession of the doctrine of the gospel, with true Christian charity". Extremes are lack of hospitality and extravagance.

  • Parsimony and Frugality: Closely related virtues that guard against unnecessary expense and ensure the proper disposition of honestly acquired goods. Parsimony involves giving moderately, while frugality involves a proper disposition of things. Both are seen as means between the extremes of covetousness and prodigality.

  • Rejection of Mandatory Community of Goods: The commentary argues against the idea that Christians should have all things in common based on the early church's example. The arguments against mandatory communalism are:

  • The early church practice was easy and necessary for them but not for the current church.

  • It was voluntary, not forced by law. "While it remained was it not your own? and after it was sold, was it not in your own power." (Acts 5:4)

  • It was a particular custom, not observed in all churches.

  • It was temporary, not intended as a permanent model.

  • Reasons for Private Property: The commentary lists four reasons why the distinction and possession of private goods are sanctioned by this commandment:

  • "That we may honestly maintain and support ourselves and those who are depending upon us."

  • "That we may have something to contribute towards the preservation of the church."

  • "That we may assist in upholding the interests of the state according to our ability."

  • "That we may be able to confer benefits upon our friends, and contribute to the relief of the poor and needy."

Conclusion:

The commentary on Lord's Day 42 provides a robust and nuanced understanding of the eighth commandment, moving beyond a simple prohibition of theft to encompass a comprehensive framework for economic ethics. It emphasizes the importance of honesty, justice, and generosity in all dealings related to property and possessions, while also affirming the legitimacy and purpose of private ownership. The text highlights a range of virtues that enable individuals to live out the requirements of the commandment and actively contribute to the well-being of their neighbors and society.


What does God forbid in the eighth commandment?

Based on the provided source, the eighth commandment, "You shall not steal," forbids a wide range of actions and attitudes related to acquiring and handling possessions.

Specifically, God forbids:

  • Theft and robbery as are punished by the government.

  • All wicked tricks and devices whereby one seeks to get their neighbor’s goods, whether by force or by deceit.

  • Using unjust weights, lengths, measures, goods, coins, or usury.

  • Any means of acquiring goods forbidden by God.

  • All covetousness.

  • The misuse and waste of God’s gifts.

  • All frauds and cunning devices and arts by which the goods and possessions of our neighbor are injured, diminished, or confounded so as to lose his right in them, or to make it doubtful.

  • Desiring or attempting to take to yourself your neighbor’s goods by fraud. The source defines theft as "the taking of that which belongs to another, without his knowledge and will, with the intention to deprive him of it".

  • Every unjust and unlawful transfer of property, whether by violence (like robberies) or by fraud and deceit (like theft).

  • Embezzling, or taking that which belongs to the state or commonwealth.

  • Sacrilege, which is taking some sacred or holy thing.

  • The various deceptions practiced in merchandising, including using fraud and artifice in effecting contracts or sales, and all wicked tricks and devices designed to appropriate to oneself what belongs to another.

  • Usury, which is the gain received in view of that which has been borrowed or loaned, though certain just contracts (rent, compensation for loss, partnership, buying) are exceptions.

  • Avarice and theft, considered extremes of contentment.

  • feigned refusal to receive something one greatly desires.

  • Inhumanity, described as not receiving anything.

  • Unfaithfulness, which involves having no care for the losses and injuries of others and not diligently performing one's duty.

  • Negligence and slothfulness, desiring public good without contributing to it.

  • Penuriousness, meanness, and covetousness, which involve desiring to increase possessions by right or wrong, lacking confidence in God, trusting in fortune, not being contented with lawful gains, desiring more and more, seeking unlawful means to take what one has no right to, and not giving where God requires liberality.

  • Prodigality, or a lavish expenditure and waste of God's gifts and possessions, giving beyond necessity or propriety due to delight in excessive use.

  • want of hospitality towards strangers.

  • Extravagance in entertaining strangers to the point of exhausting one's ability to meet personal needs.

In essence, the commandment forbids any action or attitude that unjustly deprives another person of their rightful possessions or misuses and wastes the resources God has provided.


What does God require?

Based on the provided sources, in the eighth commandment ("You shall not steal"), God requires several positive actions and attitudes related to property and dealing with one's neighbor:

  • Further your neighbor’s good where you can and may.

  • Deal with him as you would have others deal with you. This is the Golden Rule applied to property and economic interactions.

  • Labor faithfully, so that you may be able to help the poor in their need. This highlights the requirement to work diligently not only for personal sustenance but also to enable acts of charity.

  • You shall defend, preserve and increase your neighbor's possessions.

  • You shall give unto your neighbor what belongs to him.

Beyond these explicit requirements, the source explains that in forbidding theft and related actions, God at the same time enjoins all those virtues which contribute to the preservation of our neighbor’s goods and possessions. These virtues, while described as contributing to preserving others' goods, also represent required dispositions and actions for individuals in handling their own possessions and interacting with others:

  • Commutative Justice: While primarily defining just acquisition and disposition of goods through contracts (like buying/selling, borrowing/lending, donation, exchange, leasing, pledging, trusting, partnership, cultivation), observing this justice is a requirement. It consists in preserving an equality between merit and reward, wages and labor according to just laws.

  • Contentment: God requires that we be satisfied and contented with our present possessions, which we have honestly acquired. This includes quietly enduring poverty and other inconveniences, and not desiring what does not belong to us, nor what is unnecessary.

  • Fidelity: This requires having a concern and anxiety in regard to the losses and privations of another, and endeavors to avert them. It also involves willingly and diligently performing all the different duties which are devolving upon us in our appropriate callings to provide for ourselves and our dependents, and that we may also have that with which we may supply the wants of others, with the design to glorify God.

  • Liberality: This virtue requires contributing of one's substance to those who are in want, from right considerations and motives. It means communicating of one's own possessions to others not just out of civil constraint, but from divine and natural law, godliness, and charity, with a liberal heart according to ability and necessity, knowing where, to whom, when, and how much to give.

  • Hospitality: A species of liberality, this requires us to entertain strangers and travelers, and especially those who have been banished on account of the profession of the doctrine of the gospel, with true Christian charity. It involves liberality and kindness towards strangers, particularly Christians driven into exile or forced to travel for their faith.

  • Parsimony: This virtue requires us to guard against all unnecessary expense and take care of that which we have honestly acquired for ourselves and for those who are connected with us, not desiring more than necessary for comfort. It is closely allied with liberality, requiring restriction according to sound reason, retaining as much as propriety admits, and giving as much as is needed.

  • Frugality: This virtue, closely allied to parsimony, requires having respect to household affairs and disposing of what has been honestly acquired, properly and profitably, and for things necessary and useful. It involves incurring expense only for necessary and useful things.

Furthermore, the source outlines the necessary reasons for individuals having distinct possessions, which imply corresponding requirements for their use:

  • To honestly maintain and support ourselves and those who are depending upon us.

  • To have something to contribute towards the preservation of the church.

  • To assist in upholding the interests of the state according to our ability.

  • That we may be able to confer benefits upon our friends, and contribute to the relief of the poor and needy.

In essence, God requires not only abstaining from theft and fraud but also actively working diligently, dealing justly and charitably with others, managing one's possessions responsibly, and using them to support oneself, family, the church, the state, friends, and the poor.


How does this commandment define and protect private property rights and obligations?

Based on the provided source, the eighth commandment, "You shall not steal," defines and protects private property rights and obligations in several key ways:

  1. Sanctions Private Property: The commandment sanctions and authorizes a distinction in property or possessions. The source states that the very fact that it is not lawful to steal implies that "every man should possess that which lawfully belongs to him". This establishes the principle that individuals have a right to own property distinct from others.

  2. Protects Against Unlawful Transfer: The primary goal of the commandment is "the preservation of the property or possessions which God has given to every one for the support of life". It explicitly forbids not only such theft and robbery as are punished by the government, but also "all wicked tricks and devices, whereby we seek to get our neighbor’s goods, whether by force or by deceit". This includes using unjust weights, lengths, measures, goods, coins, usury, or any means forbidden by God. It condemns all frauds and "cunning devices and arts by which the goods and possessions of our neighbor are injured, diminished or confounded so as to lose his right in them, or to make it doubtful". Theft is defined as "the taking of that which belongs to another, without his knowledge and will, with the intention to deprive him of it". Various forms of theft are listed, including embezzling state goods, sacrilege (taking sacred things), deceptions in merchandising and contracts, and usury. By forbidding these actions, the commandment protects the rightful owner's possession and right to their property.

  3. Enjoins Virtues Supporting Property Preservation: In forbidding theft and related frauds, the commandment "at the same time enjoins all those virtues which contribute to the preservation of our neighbor’s goods and possessions". This includes the requirement to "defend, preserve and increase" your neighbor's possessions and "give unto your neighbor what belongs to him".

  4. Requires Positive Actions Regarding Property: Beyond simply not stealing, the commandment requires positive actions. It obliges you to "further my neighbor’s good where I can and may; deal with him as I would have others deal with me". It also requires you to "labor faithfully, so that I may be able to help the poor in their need". This highlights that the right to property is coupled with an obligation to use it justly and charitably.

  5. Upholds Commutative Justice: The source introduces Commutative Justice as a key virtue under this commandment, which concerns the "acquisition of goods" and "contributes to an arithmetical equality in contracts and in the ordinary traffic amongst men". This justice requires preserving equality between merit and reward, or wages and labor. The source describes how property can be acquired privately and singly in various ways. It details ten classes of contracts that fall under commutative justice, regulating how property can be justly transferred or used with consent, including:

    • Buying and Selling: transferring an article for a just and equivalent price.

    • Borrowing: transferring the use of a thing with the return of an equivalent value.

    • Lending: granting the use of a specific thing to be returned whole, without remuneration for use.

    • Donation: transferring a thing without recompense by the rightful owner's free will.

    • Exchange: exchanging things of equal value by consent.

    • Leasing or Letting Out: giving use of a thing for a fee, without transferring possession right.

    • Pledging or Mortgaging: transferring a thing as security for a debt or with conditions for its use if not redeemed.

    • Committing in Trust: entrusting only the keeping of a thing to another.

    • Partnership: associating in business with shared loss/gain based on contributions (funds/labor).

    • Cultivation Contract: transferring use/possession of land to a farmer in exchange for service. These contracts demonstrate the recognition and regulation of how individuals can justly acquire, transfer, and manage their private property.

  6. Rejects Communal Ownership as a General Rule: The source addresses several objections suggesting that possessions should be common rather than private. It argues against applying the example of the Apostles having things in common, stating it was easy and necessary temporarily for a small group facing danger, not a general law for the whole church today. It distinguishes natural law's unchangeability regarding morality from its flexibility regarding "natural benefits and utility". Christ's instruction to the rich young man was a special calling to him personally, intended to show his lack of perfection, and instructed him to "give to the poor," not to a common treasury. The idea that all things belong to Christians because they belong to Christ means they have a "right to the thing," but not necessarily "right in the thing" immediately. Finally, friends having things in common refers to use and enjoyment "according to just laws" or "according to sound reason," not common ownership or possession. Each friend retains "a distinct possession and right to his own goods". These arguments reinforce the commandment's sanction of distinct private possessions.

  7. Connects Property to Duties and Virtues: The source explains why private possession of goods or a distinction of rights is necessary and sanctioned by the commandment. The reasons include:

    • To "honestly maintain and support ourselves and those who are depending upon us".

    • To "have something to contribute towards the preservation of the church".

    • To "assist in upholding the interests of the state according to our ability".

    • To "be able to confer benefits upon our friends, and contribute to the relief of the poor and needy". This shows that private property is not just a right but a stewardship intended to enable individuals to fulfill personal, familial, religious, civic, and charitable obligations. Furthermore, virtues like Contentment (being satisfied with honestly acquired possessions, enduring poverty, not desiring what doesn't belong to you or is unnecessary), Fidelity (caring for others' losses, diligently laboring in one's calling to provide for oneself and others), Liberality (contributing possessions to the needy from right motives and ability), Hospitality (entertaining strangers and travelers, especially persecuted Christians), Parsimony (guarding against unnecessary expense, taking care of acquired goods for oneself and dependents), and Frugality (properly and profitably disposing of honestly acquired goods for necessary/useful things) are discussed as essential to the proper use and handling of private property and combating the vices opposed to it (such as avarice, covetousness, unfaithfulness, negligence, prodigality).

In summary, the eighth commandment, as expounded in the source, not only prohibits theft and fraud, thereby protecting private property, but also actively sanctions the existence of private property as necessary for life support and for fulfilling various duties towards oneself, family, church, state, friends, and the poor. It defines just ways of acquiring and transferring property through concepts like commutative justice and outlines virtues essential for its responsible stewardship.


What is commutative justice?

Based on the sources provided, commutative justice is described as a virtue related to the acquisition and disposition of goods, particularly within the context of the eighth commandment which sanctions and authorizes the distinction in property or possessions.

Here's a breakdown of what the sources say about commutative justice:

  • Core Definition: It is a virtue in the acquisition of goods. It does not desire the possessions of another. Its purpose is to contribute to an arithmetical equality in contracts and in the ordinary traffic amongst men in the purchase and exchange of goods according to just laws. It consists in preserving an equality between merit and reward, wages and labor, etc., whether it be in the acquisition, or disposition of goods.

  • Scope: It relates to how things that belong to persons privately and singly are acquired and transferred. Those things which belong rightly to someone can only pass into the hands of others with the consent of the owner, such as by inheritance or contract. All contracts are included under commutative justice.

  • Examples of Contracts under Commutative Justice: The sources list several types of contracts that fall under this virtue, which are to be observed for a better understanding of it:

    • Buying and selling: An article passes from seller to buyer, with the buyer giving a just and equivalent price. This includes the buying of revenues or receiving income, which is considered distinct from usury.

    • Borrowing: The use of a thing is transferred, and the borrower returns that which is equivalent (similar or of equal value).

    • Lending: The use of a thing is granted for a time, with the self-same thing to be returned whole and without injury, without payment for its use.

    • Donation: A thing is transferred without recompense by the rightful owner; this does not conflict with justice unless given with the intention that compensation be made.

    • Exchange: Things are exchanged by consent of the lawful owners, with one thing given for another of equal value.

    • Leasing or letting out: The use of a thing, without possession right, is given for a sum and returned in good state at the end of the term.

    • Pledging or mortgaging: A thing is transferred giving the other person a right to it until a debt is paid, or the right to use it if not redeemed.

    • Committing in trust: Only the keeping of a thing is entrusted, not its use or possession.

    • Partnership: Persons associate in business, sharing loss or gain proportionally based on contributions (funds or labor).

    • Cultivation contract: Use or possession of land transferred to a farmer to cultivate and render service to the owner.

  • Opposite: The opposite of commutative justice is every unjust and unlawful transfer of property. This includes transfers effected by violence, such as robberies, or by fraud and deceit, such as theft. Theft is defined as taking another's property without their knowledge and will, with the intention to deprive them of it.

In essence, commutative justice is the virtue that ensures fairness and equality in transactions and transfers of property between individuals, upholding the principle that each person should receive what is due to them according to just laws.